Wednesday, September 14, 2005
Tiring day.
Barely could listen to what my professor has to say during law class. Thank goodness there was no in-class assignment. I would probably fail it. Why? Cos my bio clock tells me to wake up at 5am in the morning. Shit.
Completed part of my A100 practices. More to go through. Hopefull Professor T will give us the answers to the past-year exams for me to compare. At last I completed my homework for law. Such anguish to read all those alien text.
Completed 3 miles. Damn proud of myself, haha. My calfs are screaming for rest. Short day, short entry. Oh ya to sum it up, my fren had this very interesting caselaw. Check him out, I got him linked at Lawyer Voyeur. Damn cool guy.
I found this excerpt from a case, Wheat v Eakin, in my Civ Pro text. The defendent acting pro se (without the help of a lawyer) responded to the plaintiff's complaint with the following words: 'Not only do I deny all the allegations in the above styled suit, I contend, with all due respect, that the plaintiff must be suffering from a condition of brown eyeballs since he is full of so much bullshit.'
The court held that no default should be entered against the answer because 'While the form and language of the appellant's response are less than desirable and more frank than customary, the appellant did state in short and plain terms his general denial of appellees' claims.'
Nice.
Barely could listen to what my professor has to say during law class. Thank goodness there was no in-class assignment. I would probably fail it. Why? Cos my bio clock tells me to wake up at 5am in the morning. Shit.
Completed part of my A100 practices. More to go through. Hopefull Professor T will give us the answers to the past-year exams for me to compare. At last I completed my homework for law. Such anguish to read all those alien text.
Completed 3 miles. Damn proud of myself, haha. My calfs are screaming for rest. Short day, short entry. Oh ya to sum it up, my fren had this very interesting caselaw. Check him out, I got him linked at Lawyer Voyeur. Damn cool guy.
I found this excerpt from a case, Wheat v Eakin, in my Civ Pro text. The defendent acting pro se (without the help of a lawyer) responded to the plaintiff's complaint with the following words: 'Not only do I deny all the allegations in the above styled suit, I contend, with all due respect, that the plaintiff must be suffering from a condition of brown eyeballs since he is full of so much bullshit.'
The court held that no default should be entered against the answer because 'While the form and language of the appellant's response are less than desirable and more frank than customary, the appellant did state in short and plain terms his general denial of appellees' claims.'
Nice.
# posted by gougou @ 12:55 AM 
